🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic talks with Washington as long as it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed new appeals had been made by go-betweens to resume talks with the US government. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is treading a challenging course since Iran wishes not to be seen to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out stronger defensively and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Unexpectedly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that ended with Donald Trump claiming the sites had been destroyed. Afterward, European countries used their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with American involvement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats asserted repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the offer could be revived in certain ways if talks reopen.

The American leader in recent days claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Iranian officials say they are not yet getting clear proposals from the United States either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran states diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement revealed the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He said the strikes commenced with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making trust difficult to rebuild.

Negotiations Continues the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly tried to dictate their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and stays the ultimate solution to settle conflicts, but its standards, rules and principles must be respected."

"Provided that they address to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and honor, they will get a answer in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained many lessons from this conflict; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this war. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but were unable to destroy. The Iranian people have become more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the country in the wake of this assault."